top domain questions



The theory of biologically conditioned conformity


People are divided into two broad categories, conformists and nonconformists.

Conformists represent the great mass of people whose only main goal, that is, the main directive for them is the survival of the species in the short and possibly medium term (as a biological conditioning, the survival instinct, not survival through strategic thinking). Anything that gets in the way of this goal is rejected with hatred and brutality. For them it does not matter who is in power, communism, democracy, fascism, all that matters is that the group they are part of is composed only of conformists like them, so that the chances of having resources with which to raise their children are maximized.

For nonconformists, the main directive is to find the truth, this category includes certain marginal politicians, revolutionaries, and disturbing writers.

The two categories are totally incompatible, probably some who read what I write will find themselves and realize that they have experienced this all their lives in the groups they have been through.

The term cowards or stupid or sheep addressed to conformists is not appropriate. I have fallen into this trap many times and had to accept the truth. Conformists are also brave and strong and hardworking and smart (not necessarily wise or intelligent) very good at work, family-oriented, honest, but because the first directive defeats everything else then depending on the context they can seem cowardly, weak, stupid (it seems that with any clear and logical evidence nothing passes, it's like a wall). When in fact they are just conformists with the number 1 priority the immediate survival of the species through conformity, gathering resources for family and children, the group of friends, functional society, work colleagues.

Conformists instinctively recognize immediately whether the person they are talking to is a conformist or not, and they isolate the nonconformist and reject him immediately. Only the tribes and societies in which the conformists did their job survived. Communities in which the percentage of nonconformists was too high over time grew old and disappeared. By contradiction, nonconformists do not understand what world they live in in relation to conformists and do not understand what is happening to them and why, that they just told the truth, believing that this is what everyone wants and are brutally rejected.

It should not be seen as a shame to be a conformist, it is a social role that society must understand and accept. That would be the next step in understanding what is happening to us, why people irrationally accept all the horrors around them. It is not because conformists are stupid, they understand very well what is happening, it is just that the instinct and the group they are part of are far too strong for them to be able to do anything. The survival of the species has depended on them until now, nothing will change overnight. For a conformist, the loss of social status and isolation from the group is much more serious than death. I think that for someone in a corporation to go out in front of their colleagues and say that I do not vaccinate would be a nightmare worse than death.

Here we must take the step and come to understand, to get over the hatred (justified from a certain point of view) and to accept that nature, from God or through natural selection, has created a social category with a certain clear role in society. To say of a conformist that he is good in an enlightened democracy and that he is a beast in a dictatorship because he executes the order is an interpretation that hits the nerves. We judge them from our point of view. But we must judge them from their point of view.

The moment we succeed in converting a conformist to nonconformism, we would be committing a perverted act against nature. Conformists should be left alone, not disturbed, and even more so, we should behave like conformists around them because you are not helping anything if you fight with them, no one wins.

Conformists are not cowards. Can you say after having known thousands of conformists in your life that they are cowards? To me, it seems the opposite. I don't think it has anything to do with it. This is precisely the trick that has tricked us all these years, we have tried to think logically when in fact there was something in our essence, a biological conditioning. Like you say about women that they are greedy that they want their man to be taller than them, with more money than them, stronger than them. And you would say about a man that he is insecure because he wants a woman shorter, poorer and weaker than him. If you think logically that would be the case, when in fact it is biological conditioning. As Poirot said, when you eliminate all other causes the one that remains must be the real one.

The most serious problem is that conformists can be used as bargaining chips in the vote, so theoretically they would not be allowed to vote.





Noindexed record